head to head · open source

neko vs Megacubo

neko has 22,315 GitHub stars, 1,628 forks, 151 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Megacubo has 604 stars, 91 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. neko leads on adoption by 3,595% (22,315 vs 604 stars). neko is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Megacubo is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. neko has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Megacubo 15%. neko was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

neko ★ 22K Megacubo ★ 604 category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

neko Megacubo
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 604
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-06
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 91
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick neko if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full neko profile →

pick Megacubo if

  • You want the Megacubo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Megacubo fits your workflow better

full Megacubo profile →

About neko

Neko is a self hosted virtual browser that runs inside a Docker container and streams its desktop to several people at once over WebRTC, built for developers testing web applications, privacy conscious users, and teams who want to browse, watch or present together in one shared session.

read the full neko overview →

About Megacubo

Megacubo is a free, open source, cross platform IPTV player for the M3U ecosystem, built for people on Windows, macOS, Linux, and Android who want to organize and watch publicly available live TV, radio, and community stream lists in one place.

read the full Megacubo overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

neko vs Jellyfin neko vs Invidious neko vs Navidrome neko vs Kodi neko vs Nuclear neko vs PeerTube neko vs iptv-sources neko vs ansible-nas neko vs Anthias neko vs tvheadend neko vs Ghosten-Player neko vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is neko or Megacubo more popular?

neko has 22,315 GitHub stars and Megacubo has 604. neko has the larger community by that measure.

Are neko and Megacubo free?

Both are open source. neko is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Megacubo under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between neko and Megacubo?

neko is written in Go and Megacubo in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, neko or Megacubo?

Choose neko if you want the larger community (22,315 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Megacubo if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.