head to head · open source

neko vs ansible-nas

neko has 22,315 GitHub stars, 1,628 forks, 151 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. ansible-nas has 3,780 stars, 513 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. neko leads on adoption by 490% (22,315 vs 3,780 stars). neko is written in Go under Apache-2.0; ansible-nas is written in Jinja under MIT. neko has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, ansible-nas 14%. neko was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (docker, media-streaming, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

neko ★ 22K ansible-nas ★ 3.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

neko ansible-nas
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 3.8K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Jinja
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-02-17
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 513
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick neko if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full neko profile →

pick ansible-nas if

  • You want the ansible-nas feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Jinja
  • You evaluated both and ansible-nas fits your workflow better

full ansible-nas profile →

About neko

Neko is a self hosted virtual browser that runs inside a Docker container and streams its desktop to several people at once over WebRTC, built for developers testing web applications, privacy conscious users, and teams who want to browse, watch or present together in one shared session.

read the full neko overview →

About ansible-nas

Ansible NAS is an open source Ansible playbook for building a home server or network attached storage replacement on a stock Ubuntu system. It lives in the self hosted homelab ecosystem, where users combine Ansible automation, Docker containers, and Ubuntu Server to run personal services on hardware they own.

read the full ansible-nas overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs ansible-nas jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

neko vs Jellyfin neko vs Invidious neko vs Navidrome neko vs Kodi neko vs Nuclear neko vs PeerTube neko vs iptv-sources neko vs Anthias neko vs tvheadend neko vs Ghosten-Player neko vs BookWyrm neko vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is neko or ansible-nas more popular?

neko has 22,315 GitHub stars and ansible-nas has 3,780. neko has the larger community by that measure.

Are neko and ansible-nas free?

Both are open source. neko is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ansible-nas under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between neko and ansible-nas?

neko is written in Go and ansible-nas in Jinja. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, neko or ansible-nas?

Choose neko if you want the larger community (22,315 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ansible-nas if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.