head to head · open source
neko vs Ghosten-Player
neko has 22,592 GitHub stars, 1,648 forks, 151 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Ghosten-Player has 3,390 stars, 211 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. neko leads on adoption by 566% (22,592 vs 3,390 stars). neko is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. neko has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Ghosten-Player 6%. Ghosten-Player was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| neko | Ghosten-Player | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 3.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Dart |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 211 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick neko if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Ghosten-Player if
- You want the Ghosten-Player feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Dart
- You evaluated both and Ghosten-Player fits your workflow better
About neko
n.eko Welcome to Neko, a self hosted virtual browser that runs in Docker and uses WebRTC technology. Neko is a powerful tool that allows you to run a fully functional browser in a virtual environment , giving you the ability to access the internet securely and privately from anywhere . With Neko, you can browse the web, run applications , and perform other tasks just as you would on a regular browser, all within a secure and isolated environment . Whether you are a developer looking to test web applications, a privacy conscious user seeking a secure browsing experience , or simply someone who wants to take…
About Ghosten-Player
中文 English Ghosten Player 是一款同时适配 📱 Android Phone 和 📺 Android TV 的视频播放器(未来将支持 Windows 和 macOS)。整合影视资源，自动刮削媒体信息，支持IPTV播放，优雅打造私人影视库。 界面简洁，功能丰富，开箱即用。 如果项目对您有帮助，就请给颗🌟Star吧。 项目处于用爱发电阶段，请考虑赞助支持项目持续维护。您的支持是我维护的最大动力(′･ω･ ) Features 自动刮削媒体信息 themoviedb nfo 客户端 Android Phone 和 Android Pad Android TV Windows (开发中) Macos (开发中) 网盘支持 支持阿里云盘、夸克网盘、Webdav和本地媒体文件 支持Emby和Jellyfin 清晰度切换(阿里云盘) 多账号登录 网盘文件查看和管理 文件下载和边下边播 多线程网络加速 IPTV 线路切换 自动分组 节目时间表EPG 播放器 手势操作(双击播放/暂停/快进/快退，音量/亮度调节，画面缩放，拖动快进，长按倍速等) 跳过片头/片尾 播放内嵌字幕和外置字幕[^2] 倍速播放 视频轨道选择 DLNA投屏 自定义字幕样式 UI 中英双语 浅色和深色模式 支持手机端辅助TV端输入 自定义界面大小 TV端自定义按键 其他 纯本地运行，无需后端服务支持 [^1] 软件体积小 (≈ 15…
read the full Ghosten-Player overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Media & Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is neko or Ghosten-Player more popular?
neko has 22,592 GitHub stars and Ghosten-Player has 3,390. neko has the larger community by that measure.
Are neko and Ghosten-Player free?
Both are open source. neko is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Ghosten-Player under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between neko and Ghosten-Player?
neko is written in Go and Ghosten-Player in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, neko or Ghosten-Player?
Choose neko if you want the larger community (22,592 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Ghosten-Player if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.