head to head · open source

nats-server vs Timeplus

nats-server has 20,989 GitHub stars, 2,025 forks, 472 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Timeplus has 2,280 stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. nats-server leads on adoption by 821% (20,989 vs 2,280 stars). nats-server is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. nats-server has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Timeplus 5%. nats-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nats-server ★ 21K Timeplus ★ 2.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

nats-server Timeplus
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 2.3K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go C++
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-30
Forks ⑂ 2.0K ⑂ 112
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nats-server if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nats-server profile →

pick Timeplus if

  • You want the Timeplus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Timeplus fits your workflow better

full Timeplus profile →

About nats-server

NATS is a simple, secure and performant communications system for digital systems, services and devices. NATS is part of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). NATS has over 40 client language implementations, and its server can run on premise, in the cloud, at the edge, and even on a Raspberry Pi. NATS can secure and simplify design and operation of modern distributed systems. [![License][License Image]][License Url] [![Build][Build Status Image]][Build Status Url] [![Release][Release Image]][Release Url] [![Slack][Slack Image]][Slack Url] [![Coverage][Coverage Image]][Coverage Url] [![Docker…

read the full nats-server overview →

About Timeplus

Fastest SQL pipeline engine for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI What's Timeplus Proton 🚀 The fastest SQL pipeline engine in a single C++ binary, for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI. A simple, fast and efficient alternative to ksqlDB and Apache Flink, powered by ClickHouse engine. 🔥 SQL for everything : Native source/sink (Kafka, ClickHouse, MySQL, Postgres, MongoDB, S3/Iceberg, OpenSearch etc.), Streaming ingestion, Multi stream JOINs, Incremental Materialized Views, Alerting, Tasks, UDF in Python/JS etc. ⚡ No JVM. No ZooKeeper. Zero dependencies. Just speed, control and…

read the full Timeplus overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

Frequently asked questions

Is nats-server or Timeplus more popular?

nats-server has 20,989 GitHub stars and Timeplus has 2,280. nats-server has the larger community by that measure.

Are nats-server and Timeplus free?

Both are open source. nats-server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Timeplus under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nats-server and Timeplus?

nats-server is written in Go and Timeplus in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nats-server or Timeplus?

Choose nats-server if you want the larger community (20,989 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Timeplus if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.