head to head · open source

nats-server vs SIP.js

nats-server has 20,749 GitHub stars, 1,963 forks, 472 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SIP.js has 2,096 stars, 728 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. nats-server leads on adoption by 890% (20,749 vs 2,096 stars). nats-server is written in Go under Apache-2.0; SIP.js is written in TypeScript under MIT. nats-server has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, SIP.js 35%. nats-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nats-server ★ 21K SIP.js ★ 2.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

nats-server SIP.js
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 2.1K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-06-15
Forks ⑂ 2.0K ⑂ 728
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nats-server if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nats-server profile →

pick SIP.js if

  • You want the SIP.js feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and SIP.js fits your workflow better

full SIP.js profile →

About nats-server

nats server is the Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed server at the heart of NATS, a simple, secure and performant communications system for digital systems, services and devices, aimed at teams building distributed systems, microservices, and cloud, edge or connected vehicle deployments that need messaging without running heavyweight broker infrastructure.

read the full nats-server overview →

About SIP.js

SIP.js is an MIT licensed TypeScript library that gives web applications a JavaScript signaling stack for SIP over WebSocket, so browsers can place and receive real time audio and video sessions through WebRTC.

read the full SIP.js overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

nats-server vs kafka nats-server vs webrtc nats-server vs AutoMQ nats-server vs Soketi nats-server vs MadelineProto nats-server vs dino nats-server vs Timeplus nats-server vs Sequin nats-server vs Trench nats-server vs Hook0 nats-server vs Operational nats-server vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is nats-server or SIP.js more popular?

nats-server has 20,749 GitHub stars and SIP.js has 2,096. nats-server has the larger community by that measure.

Are nats-server and SIP.js free?

Both are open source. nats-server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SIP.js under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nats-server and SIP.js?

nats-server is written in Go and SIP.js in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nats-server or SIP.js?

Choose nats-server if you want the larger community (20,749 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SIP.js if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.