head to head · open source

nats-server vs Soketi

nats-server has 20,745 GitHub stars, 1,962 forks, 472 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Soketi has 5,633 stars, 363 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 1.5 years ago. nats-server leads on adoption by 268% (20,745 vs 5,633 stars). nats-server is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Soketi is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. nats-server has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Soketi 6%. nats-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nats-server ★ 21K Soketi ★ 5.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

nats-server Soketi
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 5.6K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2025-03-03
Forks ⑂ 2.0K ⑂ 363
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nats-server if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nats-server profile →

pick Soketi if

  • You want the Soketi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Soketi fits your workflow better

full Soketi profile →

About nats-server

nats server is the Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed server at the heart of NATS, a simple, secure and performant communications system for digital systems, services and devices, aimed at teams building distributed systems, microservices, and cloud, edge or connected vehicle deployments that need messaging without running heavyweight broker infrastructure.

read the full nats-server overview →

About Soketi

Soketi is an open source, Pusher compatible WebSockets server written in TypeScript that lets developers run their own real time channels infrastructure instead of paying for a hosted Pusher plan.

read the full Soketi overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi soketi vs timeplus automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

nats-server vs kafka nats-server vs webrtc nats-server vs AutoMQ nats-server vs MadelineProto nats-server vs dino nats-server vs Timeplus nats-server vs Sequin nats-server vs Trench nats-server vs Hook0 nats-server vs Operational nats-server vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is nats-server or Soketi more popular?

nats-server has 20,745 GitHub stars and Soketi has 5,633. nats-server has the larger community by that measure.

Are nats-server and Soketi free?

Both are open source. nats-server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Soketi under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nats-server and Soketi?

nats-server is written in Go and Soketi in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nats-server or Soketi?

Choose nats-server if you want the larger community (20,745 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Soketi if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.