head to head · open source

juicefs vs FlyEnv

juicefs has 14,440 GitHub stars, 1,290 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped today. FlyEnv has 3,233 stars, 371 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. juicefs leads on adoption by 347% (14,440 vs 3,233 stars). juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; FlyEnv is written in TypeScript under BSD-3-Clause. juicefs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, FlyEnv 11%. juicefs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

juicefs ★ 14K FlyEnv ★ 3.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

juicefs FlyEnv
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 3.2K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 371
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick juicefs if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full juicefs profile →

pick FlyEnv if

  • You want the FlyEnv feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and FlyEnv fits your workflow better

full FlyEnv profile →

About juicefs

JuiceFS is a Go based, Apache 2.0 distributed POSIX file system that stores file data in object storage and metadata in a database engine such as Redis, MySQL, SQLite, or TiKV, and it is aimed at cloud native infrastructure, big data, machine learning, and AI workloads.

read the full juicefs overview →

About FlyEnv

FlyEnv is a native, cross platform desktop application that installs and manages a complete local development stack — language runtimes, databases, web servers, local sites with HTTPS, and AI coding tools — directly on Windows, macOS, and Linux, for developers who want a working local environment without container orchestration.

read the full FlyEnv overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

juicefs vs mall juicefs vs Prometheus juicefs vs NocoDB juicefs vs etcd juicefs vs DBeaver juicefs vs orm juicefs vs Milvus juicefs vs TiDB juicefs vs drawDB juicefs vs typeorm juicefs vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager juicefs vs Qdrant

Frequently asked questions

Is juicefs or FlyEnv more popular?

juicefs has 14,440 GitHub stars and FlyEnv has 3,233. juicefs has the larger community by that measure.

Are juicefs and FlyEnv free?

Both are open source. juicefs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FlyEnv under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between juicefs and FlyEnv?

juicefs is written in Go and FlyEnv in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, juicefs or FlyEnv?

Choose juicefs if you want the larger community (14,440 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose FlyEnv if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.