head to head · open source

mall vs juicefs

mall has 84,799 GitHub stars, 29,830 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. juicefs has 14,440 stars, 1,290 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped today. mall leads on adoption by 487% (84,799 vs 14,440 stars). mall is written in Java under Apache-2.0; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. mall has attracted 35% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. juicefs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (redis), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

mall ★ 85K juicefs ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

mall juicefs
GitHub stars ★ 85K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 30K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick mall if

  • You weight community size — 85K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full mall profile →

pick juicefs if

  • You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better

full juicefs profile →

About mall

mall is a complete e commerce system built on Spring Boot and MyBatis, distributed as a Java project under the Apache 2.0 license. It ships two applications in one repository: a storefront system for shoppers and an administrative back office for operators. The storefront covers the home portal, product recommendation, product search, product display, shopping cart, order flow, member center, customer service, and help center. The back office covers product management, order management, member management, promotion management, operations management, content management, statistics reports, finance management, perm…

read the full mall overview →

About juicefs

JuiceFS is a Go based, Apache 2.0 distributed POSIX file system that stores file data in object storage and metadata in a database engine such as Redis, MySQL, SQLite, or TiKV, and it is aimed at cloud native infrastructure, big data, machine learning, and AI workloads.

read the full juicefs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm supabase vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

mall vs Prometheus mall vs NocoDB mall vs etcd mall vs DBeaver mall vs orm mall vs Milvus mall vs TiDB mall vs drawDB mall vs typeorm mall vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager mall vs Qdrant mall vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is mall or juicefs more popular?

mall has 84,799 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,440. mall has the larger community by that measure.

Are mall and juicefs free?

Both are open source. mall is licensed under Apache-2.0 and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between mall and juicefs?

mall is written in Java and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, mall or juicefs?

Choose mall if you want the larger community (84,799 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.