head to head · open source

orm vs juicefs

orm has 47,661 GitHub stars, 2,605 forks, 2,627 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. juicefs has 14,642 stars, 1,339 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped yesterday. orm leads on adoption by 226% (47,661 vs 14,642 stars). orm is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. orm has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. juicefs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

orm ★ 48K juicefs ★ 15K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

orm juicefs
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 15K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-11-04
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick orm if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full orm profile →

pick juicefs if

  • You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better

full juicefs profile →

About orm

Docs Discord X Blog Post Architecture Using Prisma 7? It remains fully supported. Its source lives on the v7 branch of this repository and its docs at prisma.io/docs/orm/v7. Prisma 8 is a release candidate. 8.0.0 final is expected in the next four to eight weeks. Until then a release candidate may include breaking changes, and every release ships with an upgrade recipe that the prisma 8 skill applies for you. The candidate is a complete implementation we stand behind: we treat bugs in it as urgent, and the risk you take on is a feature that is not built yet rather than churn. The feature scoreboard names every…

read the full orm overview →

About juicefs

JuiceFS is a high performance POSIX file system released under Apache License 2.0, particularly designed for the cloud native environment. The data, stored via JuiceFS, will be persisted in Object Storage (e.g. Amazon S3) , and the corresponding metadata can be persisted in various compatible database engines such as Redis, MySQL, and TiKV based on the scenarios and requirements. With JuiceFS, massive cloud storage can be directly connected to big data, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and various application platforms in production environments. Without modifying code, the massive cloud storage can be…

read the full juicefs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Frequently asked questions

Is orm or juicefs more popular?

orm has 47,661 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,642. orm has the larger community by that measure.

Are orm and juicefs free?

Both are open source. orm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between orm and juicefs?

orm is written in TypeScript and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, orm or juicefs?

Choose orm if you want the larger community (47,661 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.