head to head · open source
AnotherRedisDesktopManager vs juicefs
AnotherRedisDesktopManager has 34,834 GitHub stars, 2,714 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. juicefs has 14,642 stars, 1,339 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AnotherRedisDesktopManager leads on adoption by 138% (34,834 vs 14,642 stars). AnotherRedisDesktopManager is written in JavaScript under MIT; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. AnotherRedisDesktopManager has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. juicefs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (redis), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AnotherRedisDesktopManager | juicefs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 35K | ★ 15K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-08-20 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AnotherRedisDesktopManager if
- You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick juicefs if
- You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better
About AnotherRedisDesktopManager
Another Redis Desktop Manager 🚀🚀🚀 A faster, better and more stable redis desktop manager, compatible with Linux, windows, mac. What's more, it won't crash when loading massive keys. 简体中文 Windows Download latest exe package from release \or [gitee in China\], double click to install. Or by chocolatey : choco install another redis desktop manager Or by winget : winget install qishibo.AnotherRedisDesktopManager Or sponsor by win store, It's not free, and I will be very grateful to you. Linux Download latest AppImage package from release \or [gitee in China\], chmod +x , double click to run. Or by snap : sudo…
read the full AnotherRedisDesktopManager overview →
About juicefs
JuiceFS is a high performance POSIX file system released under Apache License 2.0, particularly designed for the cloud native environment. The data, stored via JuiceFS, will be persisted in Object Storage (e.g. Amazon S3) , and the corresponding metadata can be persisted in various compatible database engines such as Redis, MySQL, and TiKV based on the scenarios and requirements. With JuiceFS, massive cloud storage can be directly connected to big data, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and various application platforms in production environments. Without modifying code, the massive cloud storage can be…
read the full juicefs overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AnotherRedisDesktopManager or juicefs more popular?
AnotherRedisDesktopManager has 34,834 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,642. AnotherRedisDesktopManager has the larger community by that measure.
Are AnotherRedisDesktopManager and juicefs free?
Both are open source. AnotherRedisDesktopManager is licensed under MIT and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AnotherRedisDesktopManager and juicefs?
AnotherRedisDesktopManager is written in JavaScript and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AnotherRedisDesktopManager or juicefs?
Choose AnotherRedisDesktopManager if you want the larger community (34,834 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.