head to head · open source
DBeaver vs juicefs
DBeaver has 51,814 GitHub stars, 4,374 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. juicefs has 14,440 stars, 1,290 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped today. DBeaver leads on adoption by 259% (51,814 vs 14,440 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. juicefs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| DBeaver | juicefs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 52K | ★ 14K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick DBeaver if
- You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick juicefs if
- You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better
About DBeaver
DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.
read the full DBeaver overview →
About juicefs
JuiceFS is a Go based, Apache 2.0 distributed POSIX file system that stores file data in object storage and metadata in a database engine such as Redis, MySQL, SQLite, or TiKV, and it is aimed at cloud native infrastructure, big data, machine learning, and AI workloads.
read the full juicefs overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Databases projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.
Frequently asked questions
Is DBeaver or juicefs more popular?
DBeaver has 51,814 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,440. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.
Are DBeaver and juicefs free?
Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between DBeaver and juicefs?
DBeaver is written in Java and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, DBeaver or juicefs?
Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,814 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.