head to head · open source

Qdrant vs juicefs

Qdrant has 35,414 GitHub stars, 2,796 forks, 704 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. juicefs has 14,642 stars, 1,339 forks, 203 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Qdrant leads on adoption by 142% (35,414 vs 14,642 stars). Qdrant is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; juicefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Qdrant has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, juicefs 9%. juicefs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Qdrant ★ 35K juicefs ★ 15K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Qdrant juicefs
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 15K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-11-04
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Qdrant if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Qdrant profile →

pick juicefs if

  • You want the juicefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and juicefs fits your workflow better

full juicefs profile →

About Qdrant

Vector Search Engine for the next generation of AI applications Qdrant (read: quadrant ) is a vector similarity search engine and vector database. It provides a production ready service with a convenient API to store, search, and manage points—vectors with an additional payload. Qdrant is tailored for extended filtering support, making it useful for all sorts of neural network or semantic based matching, faceted search, and other applications. Qdrant is written in Rust 🦀, which makes it fast and reliable even under high load. See benchmarks. With Qdrant, embeddings or neural network encoders can be turned into…

read the full Qdrant overview →

About juicefs

JuiceFS is a high performance POSIX file system released under Apache License 2.0, particularly designed for the cloud native environment. The data, stored via JuiceFS, will be persisted in Object Storage (e.g. Amazon S3) , and the corresponding metadata can be persisted in various compatible database engines such as Redis, MySQL, and TiKV based on the scenarios and requirements. With JuiceFS, massive cloud storage can be directly connected to big data, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and various application platforms in production environments. Without modifying code, the massive cloud storage can be…

read the full juicefs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Qdrant or juicefs more popular?

Qdrant has 35,414 GitHub stars and juicefs has 14,642. Qdrant has the larger community by that measure.

Are Qdrant and juicefs free?

Both are open source. Qdrant is licensed under Apache-2.0 and juicefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Qdrant and juicefs?

Qdrant is written in Rust and juicefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Qdrant or juicefs?

Choose Qdrant if you want the larger community (35,414 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose juicefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.