head to head · open source

integration vs tagreader

integration has 7,744 GitHub stars, 1,593 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tagreader has 1,609 stars, 212 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. integration leads on adoption by 381% (7,744 vs 1,609 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; tagreader is written in Shell under GPL-3.0. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, tagreader 13%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.7K tagreader ★ 1.6K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration tagreader
GitHub stars ★ 7.7K ★ 1.6K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python Shell
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-04-27
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 212
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick tagreader if

  • You want the tagreader feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and tagreader fits your workflow better

full tagreader profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

About tagreader

tagreader is a GPL 3.0 NFC tag reader built from an ESP8266 D1 Mini and a PN532 module running ESPHome firmware, created specifically so that Home Assistant users can scan physical tags and manage them inside Home Assistant.

read the full tagreader overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

integration vs Home Assistant integration vs frigate integration vs homebridge integration vs oomwoo integration vs espectre integration vs operating-system integration vs hass-xiaomi-miot integration vs lovelace-mushroom integration vs CrateDB integration vs python-miio integration vs OpenMQTTGateway integration vs android

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or tagreader more popular?

integration has 7,744 GitHub stars and tagreader has 1,609. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and tagreader free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and tagreader under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and tagreader?

integration is written in Python and tagreader in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or tagreader?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,744 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tagreader if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.