head to head · open source
integration vs mini-media-player
integration has 7,796 GitHub stars, 1,599 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. mini-media-player has 1,724 stars, 229 forks, 219 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. integration leads on adoption by 352% (7,796 vs 1,724 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; mini-media-player is written in TypeScript under MIT. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, mini-media-player 13%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| integration | mini-media-player | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.8K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-14 | 2026-06-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 229 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick integration if
- You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mini-media-player if
- You want the mini-media-player feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and mini-media-player fits your workflow better
About integration
HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.
read the full integration overview →
About mini-media-player
Mini Media Player is a minimalistic, customizable media player card for the Home Assistant Lovelace UI, aimed at Home Assistant users who want a compact, configurable media control card on their dashboards.
read the full mini-media-player overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is integration or mini-media-player more popular?
integration has 7,796 GitHub stars and mini-media-player has 1,724. integration has the larger community by that measure.
Are integration and mini-media-player free?
Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and mini-media-player under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between integration and mini-media-player?
integration is written in Python and mini-media-player in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, integration or mini-media-player?
Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,796 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mini-media-player if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.