head to head · open source

integration vs custom-brand-icons

integration has 7,869 GitHub stars, 1,613 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. custom-brand-icons has 1,122 stars, 167 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped yesterday. integration leads on adoption by 601% (7,869 vs 1,122 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; custom-brand-icons is written in JavaScript under MIT. integration has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, custom-brand-icons 15%. custom-brand-icons was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (hacs, home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.9K custom-brand-icons ★ 1.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration custom-brand-icons
GitHub stars ★ 7.9K ★ 1.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 167
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick custom-brand-icons if

  • You want the custom-brand-icons feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and custom-brand-icons fits your workflow better

full custom-brand-icons profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) Manage (Install, track, upgrade) and discover custom elements for Home Assistant directly from the UI. What? HACS is an integration that gives the user a powerful UI to handle downloads of custom needs. Highlights of what HACS can do: Help you discover new custom elements. Help you download new custom elements. Help you keep track of your custom elements. Manage(download/update/remove) Shortcuts to repositories/issue tracker Useful links General documentation Configuration FAQ GitHub Discord Become a GitHub sponsor? ❤️ BuyMe Coffee Beer? 🍺🙈 Issues If When you experience…

read the full integration overview →

About custom-brand-icons

[![MIT License][mit shield]][mit license] [mit license]: [mit shield]: Custom brand icons Custom brand icons use the prefix phu: Append Name (of the icon) after phu: Example: phu:eggs Example: phu:chicken 🇮🇹 Special Note for Italian Users Are you monitoring your energy costs in Home Assistant? Check out my latest project: Card Bolletta . It’s a custom card specifically designed for the Italian energy market. It helps you estimate your monthly bill in real time, including taxes (IVA), system charges (Oneri di sistema), and excise duties (Accise). Key features: Support for F1, F2, F3 price brackets. Real time…

read the full custom-brand-icons overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Related comparisons

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or custom-brand-icons more popular?

integration has 7,869 GitHub stars and custom-brand-icons has 1,122. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and custom-brand-icons free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and custom-brand-icons under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and custom-brand-icons?

integration is written in Python and custom-brand-icons in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or custom-brand-icons?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,869 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose custom-brand-icons if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.