head to head · open source

integration vs calendar-card-pro

integration has 7,842 GitHub stars, 1,612 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. calendar-card-pro has 1,231 stars, 103 forks, 51 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. integration leads on adoption by 537% (7,842 vs 1,231 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; calendar-card-pro is written in TypeScript under MIT. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, calendar-card-pro 8%. calendar-card-pro was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (hacs, home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.8K calendar-card-pro ★ 1.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration calendar-card-pro
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 1.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-25 2026-10-25
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 103
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick calendar-card-pro if

  • You want the calendar-card-pro feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and calendar-card-pro fits your workflow better

full calendar-card-pro profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) Manage (Install, track, upgrade) and discover custom elements for Home Assistant directly from the UI. What? HACS is an integration that gives the user a powerful UI to handle downloads of custom needs. Highlights of what HACS can do: Help you discover new custom elements. Help you download new custom elements. Help you keep track of your custom elements. Manage(download/update/remove) Shortcuts to repositories/issue tracker Useful links General documentation Configuration FAQ GitHub Discord Become a GitHub sponsor? ❤️ BuyMe Coffee Beer? 🍺🙈 Issues If When you experience…

read the full integration overview →

About calendar-card-pro

Calendar Card Pro for Home Assistant [![hacs][hacs img]][hacs url] [![GitHub Release][github release img]][github release url] [![Downloads][github downloads img]][github release url] [![Downloads@latest][github latest downloads img]][github release url] ☕ Support This Project If you find Calendar Card Pro useful, consider supporting its development: 📖 Documentation This README covers installation and a quick start. Everything else — every configuration option, all features and worked examples — lives on the documentation site , which is searchable and always matches the latest release. 1️⃣ Overview 🔍 About…

read the full calendar-card-pro overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Related comparisons

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or calendar-card-pro more popular?

integration has 7,842 GitHub stars and calendar-card-pro has 1,231. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and calendar-card-pro free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and calendar-card-pro under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and calendar-card-pro?

integration is written in Python and calendar-card-pro in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or calendar-card-pro?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,842 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose calendar-card-pro if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.