head to head · open source

imgproxy vs Krita

imgproxy has 11,080 GitHub stars, 776 forks, 67 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Krita has 10,393 stars, 859 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. imgproxy leads on adoption by 7% (11,080 vs 10,393 stars). imgproxy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Krita is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. imgproxy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Krita 8%. Krita was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

imgproxy ★ 11K Krita ★ 10K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

imgproxy Krita
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 10K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go C++
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 776 ⑂ 859
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick imgproxy if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full imgproxy profile →

pick Krita if

  • You want the Krita feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Krita fits your workflow better

full Krita profile →

About imgproxy

imgproxy is a fast, secure standalone HTTP server, written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 licence, that resizes, processes, and converts images on the fly for web developers, platform engineers, and teams that want image processing to live in a dedicated service instead of inside their applications.

read the full imgproxy overview →

About Krita

Krita is a free and open source cross platform application for digital painting. It lives in the KDE ecosystem and is built on the KDE and Qt frameworks. The project is licensed under the GNU Public License, Version 3, and the GitHub repository is a mirror of the real code repository at https://invent.kde.org/graphics/krita.git.

read the full Krita overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

opencut vs losslesscut opencut vs sharp opencut vs rembg opencut vs audacity opencut vs filepond opencut vs shotcut opencut vs imagetoolbox opencut vs palmier-pro firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Photo & Video Editors projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.

imgproxy vs OpenCut imgproxy vs LosslessCut imgproxy vs sharp imgproxy vs rembg imgproxy vs Audacity imgproxy vs filepond imgproxy vs Shotcut imgproxy vs ImageToolbox imgproxy vs palmier-pro imgproxy vs Darktable imgproxy vs libvips imgproxy vs TagStudio

Frequently asked questions

Is imgproxy or Krita more popular?

imgproxy has 11,080 GitHub stars and Krita has 10,393. imgproxy has the larger community by that measure.

Are imgproxy and Krita free?

Both are open source. imgproxy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Krita under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between imgproxy and Krita?

imgproxy is written in Go and Krita in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, imgproxy or Krita?

Choose imgproxy if you want the larger community (11,080 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Krita if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.