head to head · open source

Godot vs Fyrox

Godot has 118,004 GitHub stars, 26,909 forks, 18,870 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Fyrox has 9,571 stars, 451 forks, 59 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Godot leads on adoption by 1,133% (118,004 vs 9,571 stars). Godot is written in C++ under MIT; Fyrox is written in Rust under MIT. Godot has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, Fyrox 5%. Godot was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (game-development, game-engine, gamedev), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Godot ★ 118K Fyrox ★ 9.6K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Godot Fyrox
GitHub stars ★ 118K ★ 9.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in C++ Rust
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 27K ⑂ 451
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Godot if

  • You weight community size — 118K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Godot profile →

pick Fyrox if

  • You want the Fyrox feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Fyrox fits your workflow better

full Fyrox profile →

About Godot

Godot Engine is a free, MIT licensed, cross platform 2D and 3D game engine that ships an editor, a class reference, export templates, and one click deployment to desktop, mobile, web and console targets, aimed at game developers who want to own their toolchain and their games without royalties.

read the full Godot overview →

About Fyrox

Fyrox is an MIT licensed, general purpose 2D and 3D game engine written in Rust, distributed as a crate with an integrated scene editor, and it is aimed at developers who want to build games in Rust with a single engine and a matching authoring tool.

read the full Fyrox overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 187K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js godot vs imgui godot vs bevy godot vs home-assistant godot vs cratedb godot vs hey godot vs octobot godot vs fleetbase firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

Godot vs three.js Godot vs imgui Godot vs bevy Godot vs raylib Godot vs GDevelop Godot vs Babylon.js Godot vs libgdx Godot vs aframe Godot vs OpenRA Godot vs engine Godot vs MonoGame Godot vs ebiten

Frequently asked questions

Is Godot or Fyrox more popular?

Godot has 118,004 GitHub stars and Fyrox has 9,571. Godot has the larger community by that measure.

Are Godot and Fyrox free?

Both are open source. Godot is licensed under MIT and Fyrox under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Godot and Fyrox?

Godot is written in C++ and Fyrox in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Godot or Fyrox?

Choose Godot if you want the larger community (118,004 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Fyrox if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.