head to head · open source
filmcraft vs fabric-video-editor
filmcraft has 18,290 GitHub stars, 7,441 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped today. fabric-video-editor has 575 stars, 169 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. filmcraft leads on adoption by 3,081% (18,290 vs 575 stars). filmcraft is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; fabric-video-editor is written in TypeScript under MIT. filmcraft has attracted 41% as many forks as stars, fabric-video-editor 29%. filmcraft was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (video-editing, video-editor), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| filmcraft | fabric-video-editor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 18K | ★ 575 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Rust | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-15 | 2026-08-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.4K | ⑂ 169 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick filmcraft if
- You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick fabric-video-editor if
- You want the fabric-video-editor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and fabric-video-editor fits your workflow better
About filmcraft
FilmCraft Video editing, color and sound; an open source, clean room reimplementation of Adobe Premiere Pro, rebuilt in pure Rust. An open source, clean room take on the Adobe Premiere Pro workflow: native on macOS, Windows and Linux, and in the browser via WebAssembly. By the ArtCraft team. FilmCraft on getartcraft.com · ArtCraft · All Crafting Apps Apollo 11 Tranquility : a three minute documentary edit of NASA's 1969 launch, landing and moonwalk film, with subtitles from the mission transcript. Every frame in these screenshots comes from public domain footage, decoded, composited and graded by FilmCraft's own…
read the full filmcraft overview →
About fabric-video-editor
The app's live link to test in the browser is: I build canvas and video editing tools professionally: timelines, design editors, and 3D product configurators for client products. If you cloned this while deciding whether to build or buy, that decision is exactly what I help with at Artless Studio. Fabric Video Editor Fabric Video Editor is a video editor that runs in the browser. It is built with fabric.js, Next.js (a React framework), Tailwindcss, Mobx, and typescript. Samples 3. New Updated UI 2. The editor supports Animations and Effects 1. Basic Working Tech Explanation todo Features [x] User can add [x]…
read the full fabric-video-editor overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Photo & Video Editors projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Photo & Video Editors field.
Frequently asked questions
Is filmcraft or fabric-video-editor more popular?
filmcraft has 18,290 GitHub stars and fabric-video-editor has 575. filmcraft has the larger community by that measure.
Are filmcraft and fabric-video-editor free?
Both are open source. filmcraft is licensed under Apache-2.0 and fabric-video-editor under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between filmcraft and fabric-video-editor?
filmcraft is written in Rust and fabric-video-editor in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, filmcraft or fabric-video-editor?
Choose filmcraft if you want the larger community (18,290 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose fabric-video-editor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.