head to head · open source

motion vs figma-use

motion has 33,834 GitHub stars, 1,387 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped yesterday. figma-use has 606 stars, 44 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. motion leads on adoption by 5,483% (33,834 vs 606 stars). motion is written in TypeScript under MIT; figma-use is written in TypeScript under MIT. motion has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, figma-use 7%. motion was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

motion ★ 34K figma-use ★ 606 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

motion figma-use
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 606
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-07-03
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 44
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick motion if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full motion profile →

pick figma-use if

  • You want the figma-use feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and figma-use fits your workflow better

full figma-use profile →

About motion

Motion is an open source, MIT licensed animation library for React, JavaScript and Vue that provides a simple API and a hybrid engine for 120fps, GPU accelerated animation.

read the full motion overview →

About figma-use

figma use is an MIT licensed TypeScript command line tool that lets developers and AI agents read and write Figma files directly from the terminal, with more than 100 commands for creating shapes, text, components, styles, and exported images.

read the full figma-use overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

motion vs ant-design motion vs open-design motion vs manim motion vs anime motion vs hyperframes motion vs daisyui motion vs tabler motion vs layui motion vs lottie-ios motion vs vant motion vs primitives motion vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is motion or figma-use more popular?

motion has 33,834 GitHub stars and figma-use has 606. motion has the larger community by that measure.

Are motion and figma-use free?

Both are open source. motion is licensed under MIT and figma-use under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between motion and figma-use?

motion is written in TypeScript and figma-use in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, motion or figma-use?

Choose motion if you want the larger community (33,834 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose figma-use if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.