head to head · open source
integration vs docker-wyze-bridge
integration has 7,877 GitHub stars, 1,613 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. docker-wyze-bridge has 3,285 stars, 311 forks, 376 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. integration leads on adoption by 140% (7,877 vs 3,285 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; docker-wyze-bridge is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. integration has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, docker-wyze-bridge 9%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| integration | docker-wyze-bridge | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.9K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-05 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 311 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick integration if
- You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick docker-wyze-bridge if
- You want the docker-wyze-bridge feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and docker-wyze-bridge fits your workflow better
About integration
HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) Manage (Install, track, upgrade) and discover custom elements for Home Assistant directly from the UI. What? HACS is an integration that gives the user a powerful UI to handle downloads of custom needs. Highlights of what HACS can do: Help you discover new custom elements. Help you download new custom elements. Help you keep track of your custom elements. Manage(download/update/remove) Shortcuts to repositories/issue tracker Useful links General documentation Configuration FAQ GitHub Discord Become a GitHub sponsor? ❤️ BuyMe Coffee Beer? 🍺🙈 Issues If When you experience…
read the full integration overview →
About docker-wyze-bridge
WebRTC/RTSP/RTMP/HLS Bridge for Wyze Cam Create a local WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, or HLS/Low Latency HLS stream for most of your Wyze cameras including the outdoor, doorbell, and 2K cams. No modifications, third party, or special firmware required. It just works! Streams direct from camera without additional bandwidth or subscriptions. Please consider ⭐️ starring or ☕️ sponsoring this project if you found it useful, or use the affiliate link when shopping on amazon! [!IMPORTANT] As of May 2024, you will need an API Key and API ID from: [!WARNING] Please double check your router/firewall and do NOT forward ports or…
read the full docker-wyze-bridge overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is integration or docker-wyze-bridge more popular?
integration has 7,877 GitHub stars and docker-wyze-bridge has 3,285. integration has the larger community by that measure.
Are integration and docker-wyze-bridge free?
Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and docker-wyze-bridge under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between integration and docker-wyze-bridge?
integration is written in Python and docker-wyze-bridge in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, integration or docker-wyze-bridge?
Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,877 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose docker-wyze-bridge if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.