head to head · open source
integration vs CrateDB
integration has 7,738 GitHub stars, 1,591 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CrateDB has 4,436 stars, 617 forks, 332 open issues and last shipped yesterday. integration leads on adoption by 74% (7,738 vs 4,436 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; CrateDB is written in Java under Apache-2.0. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, CrateDB 14%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| integration | CrateDB | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.7K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 617 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick integration if
- You weight community size — 7.7K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CrateDB if
- You want the CrateDB feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and CrateDB fits your workflow better
About integration
HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.
read the full integration overview →
About CrateDB
CrateDB is a distributed, scalable SQL database built for storing and analyzing massive amounts of data in near real time, including complex queries. It is written in Java, licensed under Apache 2.0, and based on Lucene. The project combines the benefits of an SQL database with the scalability and flexibility typically associated with NoSQL databases, and it is PostgreSQL compatible, speaking the PostgreSQL wire protocol as well as offering an HTTP API. It lives in the analytics, big data, and IoT ecosystem, and the topic list places it alongside distributed SQL databases, Elasticsearch, industrial IoT, and IoT a…
read the full CrateDB overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is integration or CrateDB more popular?
integration has 7,738 GitHub stars and CrateDB has 4,436. integration has the larger community by that measure.
Are integration and CrateDB free?
Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and CrateDB under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between integration and CrateDB?
integration is written in Python and CrateDB in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, integration or CrateDB?
Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,738 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CrateDB if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.