head to head · open source

Babylon.js vs Pumpkin

Babylon.js has 26,087 GitHub stars, 3,687 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Pumpkin has 11,292 stars, 813 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Babylon.js leads on adoption by 131% (26,087 vs 11,292 stars). Babylon.js is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Pumpkin is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. Babylon.js has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, Pumpkin 7%. Pumpkin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Babylon.js ★ 26K Pumpkin ★ 11K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Babylon.js Pumpkin
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 813
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Babylon.js if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Babylon.js profile →

pick Pumpkin if

  • You want the Pumpkin feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Pumpkin fits your workflow better

full Pumpkin profile →

About Babylon.js

Babylon.js is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed 3D game and rendering engine written in TypeScript, built for JavaScript and TypeScript developers who want to create browser based 3D games, visualizations and WebXR experiences inside a friendly JavaScript framework.

read the full Babylon.js overview →

About Pumpkin

Pumpkin is a Minecraft server implementation written entirely in Rust that aims to let anyone host fast and efficient Java and Bedrock Edition servers, and it is built for server operators and plugin developers who want vanilla compatible gameplay without the official Java server.

read the full Pumpkin overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

Babylon.js vs Godot Babylon.js vs three.js Babylon.js vs imgui Babylon.js vs bevy Babylon.js vs raylib Babylon.js vs GDevelop Babylon.js vs libgdx Babylon.js vs MonoGame Babylon.js vs azerothcore-wotlk Babylon.js vs zinx Babylon.js vs colyseus Babylon.js vs agones

Frequently asked questions

Is Babylon.js or Pumpkin more popular?

Babylon.js has 26,087 GitHub stars and Pumpkin has 11,292. Babylon.js has the larger community by that measure.

Are Babylon.js and Pumpkin free?

Both are open source. Babylon.js is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pumpkin under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Babylon.js and Pumpkin?

Babylon.js is written in TypeScript and Pumpkin in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Babylon.js or Pumpkin?

Choose Babylon.js if you want the larger community (26,087 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Pumpkin if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.