head to head · open source

zinx vs pokerth

zinx has 7,764 GitHub stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. pokerth has 657 stars, 252 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zinx leads on adoption by 1,082% (7,764 vs 657 stars). zinx is written in Go under MIT; pokerth is written in C++ under AGPL-3.0. zinx has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, pokerth 38%. pokerth was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zinx ★ 7.8K pokerth ★ 657 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zinx pokerth
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 657
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in Go C++
Last push 2026-06-06 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 252
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zinx if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zinx profile →

pick pokerth if

  • You want the pokerth feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and pokerth fits your workflow better

full pokerth profile →

About zinx

Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.

read the full zinx overview →

About pokerth

PokerTH is an open source Texas Hold'em poker game and engine written in C++ with Qt, for players who want to play against computer opponents or against other people over the internet, and for hosts who want to run the multiplayer server themselves.

read the full pokerth overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

zinx vs Godot zinx vs three.js zinx vs imgui zinx vs bevy zinx vs raylib zinx vs GDevelop zinx vs Babylon.js zinx vs libgdx zinx vs MonoGame zinx vs Pumpkin zinx vs azerothcore-wotlk zinx vs colyseus

Frequently asked questions

Is zinx or pokerth more popular?

zinx has 7,764 GitHub stars and pokerth has 657. zinx has the larger community by that measure.

Are zinx and pokerth free?

Both are open source. zinx is licensed under MIT and pokerth under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zinx and pokerth?

zinx is written in Go and pokerth in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zinx or pokerth?

Choose zinx if you want the larger community (7,764 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pokerth if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.