head to head · open source

zinx vs pinus

zinx has 7,765 GitHub stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. pinus has 1,932 stars, 392 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. zinx leads on adoption by 302% (7,765 vs 1,932 stars). zinx is written in Go under MIT; pinus is written in JavaScript under MIT. zinx has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, pinus 20%. pinus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zinx ★ 7.8K pinus ★ 1.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zinx pinus
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 1.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-06-06 2026-07-17
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 392
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zinx if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zinx profile →

pick pinus if

  • You want the pinus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and pinus fits your workflow better

full pinus profile →

About zinx

Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.

read the full zinx overview →

About pinus

Pinus is a fast, scalable, distributed game server framework for Node.js, written in TypeScript and intended for developers building multiplayer games and real time applications such as chat and message push.

read the full pinus overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 185K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

zinx vs Godot zinx vs three.js zinx vs imgui zinx vs bevy zinx vs raylib zinx vs GDevelop zinx vs Babylon.js zinx vs libgdx zinx vs aframe zinx vs OpenRA zinx vs engine zinx vs MonoGame

Frequently asked questions

Is zinx or pinus more popular?

zinx has 7,765 GitHub stars and pinus has 1,932. zinx has the larger community by that measure.

Are zinx and pinus free?

Both are open source. zinx is licensed under MIT and pinus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zinx and pinus?

zinx is written in Go and pinus in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zinx or pinus?

Choose zinx if you want the larger community (7,765 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pinus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.