head to head · open source

zinx vs mcrcon

zinx has 7,763 GitHub stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. mcrcon has 1,085 stars, 126 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. zinx leads on adoption by 615% (7,763 vs 1,085 stars). zinx is written in Go under MIT; mcrcon is written in C under Zlib. zinx has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, mcrcon 12%. zinx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zinx ★ 7.8K mcrcon ★ 1.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zinx mcrcon
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 1.1K
License MIT Zlib
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-06-06 2025-12-01
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 126
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zinx if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zinx profile →

pick mcrcon if

  • You want the mcrcon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and mcrcon fits your workflow better

full mcrcon profile →

About zinx

Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.

read the full zinx overview →

About mcrcon

mcrcon is a console based Rcon client for Minecraft that lets server administrators send remote administration commands and run server maintenance scripts from a Linux or Windows terminal.

read the full mcrcon overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 187K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

zinx vs Godot zinx vs three.js zinx vs imgui zinx vs bevy zinx vs raylib zinx vs GDevelop zinx vs Babylon.js zinx vs libgdx zinx vs aframe zinx vs OpenRA zinx vs engine zinx vs MonoGame

Frequently asked questions

Is zinx or mcrcon more popular?

zinx has 7,763 GitHub stars and mcrcon has 1,085. zinx has the larger community by that measure.

Are zinx and mcrcon free?

Both are open source. zinx is licensed under MIT and mcrcon under Zlib. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zinx and mcrcon?

zinx is written in Go and mcrcon in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zinx or mcrcon?

Choose zinx if you want the larger community (7,763 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mcrcon if its feature set, stack or Zlib licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.