head to head · open source

zinx vs LinuxGSM

zinx has 7,765 GitHub stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. LinuxGSM has 4,903 stars, 863 forks, 405 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. zinx leads on adoption by 58% (7,765 vs 4,903 stars). zinx is written in Go under MIT; LinuxGSM is written in Shell under MIT. zinx has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, LinuxGSM 18%. LinuxGSM was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zinx ★ 7.8K LinuxGSM ★ 4.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zinx LinuxGSM
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 4.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Shell
Last push 2026-06-06 2026-08-07
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 863
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zinx if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zinx profile →

pick LinuxGSM if

  • You want the LinuxGSM feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and LinuxGSM fits your workflow better

full LinuxGSM profile →

About zinx

Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.

read the full zinx overview →

About LinuxGSM

LinuxGSM is an MIT licensed, Shell based command line tool that deploys and manages more than one hundred dedicated Linux game servers, built for administrators who want to run their own multiplayer servers without spending hours on manual setup and upkeep.

read the full LinuxGSM overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

zinx vs Godot zinx vs three.js zinx vs imgui zinx vs bevy zinx vs raylib zinx vs GDevelop zinx vs Babylon.js zinx vs libgdx zinx vs aframe zinx vs MonoGame zinx vs Pumpkin zinx vs azerothcore-wotlk

Frequently asked questions

Is zinx or LinuxGSM more popular?

zinx has 7,765 GitHub stars and LinuxGSM has 4,903. zinx has the larger community by that measure.

Are zinx and LinuxGSM free?

Both are open source. zinx is licensed under MIT and LinuxGSM under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zinx and LinuxGSM?

zinx is written in Go and LinuxGSM in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zinx or LinuxGSM?

Choose zinx if you want the larger community (7,765 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose LinuxGSM if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.