head to head · open source

zinx vs kruise-game

zinx has 7,760 GitHub stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. kruise-game has 1,079 stars, 173 forks, 47 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. zinx leads on adoption by 619% (7,760 vs 1,079 stars). zinx is written in Go under MIT; kruise-game is written in Go under Apache-2.0. zinx has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, kruise-game 16%. kruise-game was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (game-server, go), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zinx ★ 7.8K kruise-game ★ 1.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zinx kruise-game
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 1.1K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-06-06 2026-07-24
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 173
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zinx if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zinx profile →

pick kruise-game if

  • You want the kruise-game feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and kruise-game fits your workflow better

full kruise-game profile →

About zinx

Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.

read the full zinx overview →

About kruise-game

OpenKruiseGame (OKG) is a Kubernetes workload for teams running multiplayer game servers on Kubernetes who need hot updates, per server operations, and game specific networking that built in workloads do not provide.

read the full kruise-game overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 188K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

zinx vs Godot zinx vs three.js zinx vs imgui zinx vs bevy zinx vs raylib zinx vs GDevelop zinx vs Babylon.js zinx vs libgdx zinx vs aframe zinx vs OpenRA zinx vs engine zinx vs MonoGame

Frequently asked questions

Is zinx or kruise-game more popular?

zinx has 7,760 GitHub stars and kruise-game has 1,079. zinx has the larger community by that measure.

Are zinx and kruise-game free?

Both are open source. zinx is licensed under MIT and kruise-game under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zinx and kruise-game?

zinx is written in Go and kruise-game in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zinx or kruise-game?

Choose zinx if you want the larger community (7,760 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kruise-game if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.