head to head · open source

zinx vs forgottenserver

zinx has 7,764 GitHub stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. forgottenserver has 1,841 stars, 1,142 forks, 226 open issues and last shipped today. zinx leads on adoption by 322% (7,764 vs 1,841 stars). zinx is written in Go under MIT; forgottenserver is written in C++ under GPL-2.0. zinx has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, forgottenserver 62%. forgottenserver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zinx ★ 7.8K forgottenserver ★ 1.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zinx forgottenserver
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 1.8K
License MIT GPL-2.0
Written in Go C++
Last push 2026-06-06 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zinx if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zinx profile →

pick forgottenserver if

  • You want the forgottenserver feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and forgottenserver fits your workflow better

full forgottenserver profile →

About zinx

Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.

read the full zinx overview →

About forgottenserver

The Forgotten Server is a free and open source MMORPG server emulator written in C++ that lets a team run its own OpenTibia compatible game world and connect players to it with a compatible client.

read the full forgottenserver overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 186K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

zinx vs Godot zinx vs three.js zinx vs imgui zinx vs bevy zinx vs raylib zinx vs GDevelop zinx vs Babylon.js zinx vs libgdx zinx vs aframe zinx vs OpenRA zinx vs engine zinx vs MonoGame

Frequently asked questions

Is zinx or forgottenserver more popular?

zinx has 7,764 GitHub stars and forgottenserver has 1,841. zinx has the larger community by that measure.

Are zinx and forgottenserver free?

Both are open source. zinx is licensed under MIT and forgottenserver under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zinx and forgottenserver?

zinx is written in Go and forgottenserver in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zinx or forgottenserver?

Choose zinx if you want the larger community (7,764 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose forgottenserver if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.