head to head · open source

Zammad vs rt

Zammad has 5,924 GitHub stars, 1,056 forks, 451 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rt has 1,157 stars, 298 forks, 82 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Zammad leads on adoption by 412% (5,924 vs 1,157 stars). Zammad is written in Ruby under AGPL-3.0; rt is written in Perl under GPL-2.0. Zammad has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, rt 26%. Zammad was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (customer-support, helpdesk, support), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Zammad ★ 5.9K rt ★ 1.2K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Zammad rt
GitHub stars ★ 5.9K ★ 1.2K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Ruby Perl
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 298
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Zammad if

  • You weight community size — 5.9K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Zammad profile →

pick rt if

  • You want the rt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Perl
  • You evaluated both and rt fits your workflow better

full rt profile →

About Zammad

Zammad is a web based, open source helpdesk and customer support platform, released under the GNU AGPLv3 and written primarily in Ruby on the Rails framework. The source code lives on GitHub and is owned by the Zammad Foundation, an entity that the README describes as independent of commercial providers such as Zammad GmbH. Development is carried out by the team at Zammad GmbH together with the community, and the project states that the software is and will stay open source.

read the full Zammad overview →

About rt

Request Tracker (RT) is an open source, enterprise grade issue and ticket tracking system written in Perl for organizations that need to track what needs to get done, who is working on which tasks, what has already been done, and when tasks were or were not completed.

read the full rt overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

chatwoot vs zammad chatwoot vs glpi chatwoot vs chaskiq chatwoot vs frappe-helpdesk chatwoot vs deskcommcrm chatwoot vs libredesk chatwoot vs goflylivechat chatwoot vs usertour plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Customer Support & Success projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Customer Support & Success field.

Zammad vs Chatwoot Zammad vs glpi Zammad vs Chaskiq Zammad vs Frappe Helpdesk Zammad vs DeskcommCRM Zammad vs libredesk Zammad vs goflylivechat Zammad vs Usertour Zammad vs TikTokLive Zammad vs iTop Zammad vs chatwoot-mobile-app Zammad vs Cossistant

Frequently asked questions

Is Zammad or rt more popular?

Zammad has 5,924 GitHub stars and rt has 1,157. Zammad has the larger community by that measure.

Are Zammad and rt free?

Both are open source. Zammad is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and rt under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Zammad and rt?

Zammad is written in Ruby and rt in Perl. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Zammad or rt?

Choose Zammad if you want the larger community (5,924 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose rt if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.