head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs Plakar

worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Plakar has 2,062 stars, 92 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 4,104% (86,684 vs 2,062 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Plakar is written in Go under ISC. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Plakar 4%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 87K Plakar ★ 2.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor Plakar
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 2.1K
License AGPL-3.0 ISC
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 92
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick Plakar if

  • You want the Plakar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the ISC license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Plakar fits your workflow better

full Plakar profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About Plakar

Plakar is an open source backup engine written in Go for the infrastructure and operations ecosystem. It is powered by Kloset, an immutable data store, and it uses the ptar format for self contained archives. Plakar creates snapshots of data, stores them in encrypted and deduplicated repositories, and lets users inspect, verify, and restore the snapshots later.

read the full Plakar overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs plakar uptime-kuma vs plakar worldmonitor vs pluton mall vs plakar worldmonitor vs openvpn worldmonitor vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn immich vs pluton uptime-kuma vs pluton mall vs pluton immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

worldmonitor vs Uptime Kuma worldmonitor vs NetData worldmonitor vs Grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs Sentry worldmonitor vs SigNoz worldmonitor vs Grafana Loki worldmonitor vs beszel worldmonitor vs cilium worldmonitor vs Apache SkyWalking worldmonitor vs jaeger worldmonitor vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or Plakar more popular?

worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars and Plakar has 2,062. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and Plakar free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Plakar under ISC. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and Plakar?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and Plakar in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or Plakar?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,684 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Plakar if its feature set, stack or ISC licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.