head to head · open source

Immich vs Plakar

Immich has 114,457 GitHub stars, 6,980 forks, 740 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Plakar has 2,062 stars, 92 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Immich leads on adoption by 5,451% (114,457 vs 2,062 stars). Immich is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Plakar is written in Go under ISC. Immich has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Plakar 4%. Immich was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Immich ★ 114K Plakar ★ 2.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Immich Plakar
GitHub stars ★ 114K ★ 2.1K
License AGPL-3.0 ISC
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 7.0K ⑂ 92
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Immich if

  • You weight community size — 114K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Immich profile →

pick Plakar if

  • You want the Plakar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the ISC license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Plakar fits your workflow better

full Plakar profile →

About Immich

Immich is a high performance self hosted photo and video management solution — an AGPL 3.0 TypeScript project — for people and households who want their photo library on a server they own rather than in Google Photos.

read the full Immich overview →

About Plakar

Plakar is an open source backup engine written in Go for the infrastructure and operations ecosystem. It is powered by Kloset, an immutable data store, and it uses the ptar format for self contained archives. Plakar creates snapshots of data, stores them in encrypted and deduplicated repositories, and lets users inspect, verify, and restore the snapshots later.

read the full Plakar overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex immich vs pluton uptime-kuma vs plakar worldmonitor vs plakar mall vs plakar immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do paperless-ngx vs ceph uptime-kuma vs pluton worldmonitor vs pluton mall vs pluton uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Immich vs Paperless-ngx Immich vs Ceph Immich vs Filestash Immich vs Garage Immich vs Storj Immich vs Alarik Immich vs Spinifex

Frequently asked questions

Is Immich or Plakar more popular?

Immich has 114,457 GitHub stars and Plakar has 2,062. Immich has the larger community by that measure.

Are Immich and Plakar free?

Both are open source. Immich is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Plakar under ISC. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Immich and Plakar?

Immich is written in TypeScript and Plakar in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Immich or Plakar?

Choose Immich if you want the larger community (114,457 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Plakar if its feature set, stack or ISC licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.