head to head · open source

frp vs Pluton

frp has 109,524 GitHub stars, 15,214 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Pluton has 788 stars, 31 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 13,799% (109,524 vs 788 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Pluton is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, Pluton 4%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K Pluton ★ 788 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp Pluton
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 788
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick Pluton if

  • You want the Pluton feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Pluton fits your workflow better

full Pluton profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About Pluton

Pluton is an Apache 2.0 licensed, self hosted backup management platform written in TypeScript. It lives in the backup and recovery ecosystem, and it uses Restic for encrypted incremental backups and Rclone for cloud storage connectivity. The project provides a web interface for creating, scheduling, monitoring, and restoring backup jobs across local and remote storage destinations.

read the full Pluton overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy kubernetes vs pluton immich vs pluton frp vs plakar uptime-kuma vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn kubernetes vs plakar immich vs plakar uptime-kuma vs plakar n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns frp vs SoftEtherVPN

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or Pluton more popular?

frp has 109,524 GitHub stars and Pluton has 788. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and Pluton free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pluton under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and Pluton?

frp is written in Go and Pluton in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or Pluton?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,524 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Pluton if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.