head to head · open source

Immich vs Pluton

Immich has 114,457 GitHub stars, 6,980 forks, 740 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pluton has 787 stars, 31 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Immich leads on adoption by 14,443% (114,457 vs 787 stars). Immich is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Pluton is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Immich has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Pluton 4%. Immich was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Immich ★ 114K Pluton ★ 787 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Immich Pluton
GitHub stars ★ 114K ★ 787
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 7.0K ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Immich if

  • You weight community size — 114K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Immich profile →

pick Pluton if

  • You want the Pluton feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Pluton fits your workflow better

full Pluton profile →

About Immich

Immich is a high performance self hosted photo and video management solution — an AGPL 3.0 TypeScript project — for people and households who want their photo library on a server they own rather than in Google Photos.

read the full Immich overview →

About Pluton

Pluton is an Apache 2.0 licensed, self hosted backup management platform written in TypeScript. It lives in the backup and recovery ecosystem, and it uses Restic for encrypted incremental backups and Rclone for cloud storage connectivity. The project provides a web interface for creating, scheduling, monitoring, and restoring backup jobs across local and remote storage destinations.

read the full Pluton overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex immich vs plakar uptime-kuma vs pluton worldmonitor vs pluton mall vs pluton immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do paperless-ngx vs ceph uptime-kuma vs plakar worldmonitor vs plakar mall vs plakar uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Immich vs Paperless-ngx Immich vs Ceph Immich vs Filestash Immich vs Garage Immich vs Storj Immich vs Alarik Immich vs Spinifex

Frequently asked questions

Is Immich or Pluton more popular?

Immich has 114,457 GitHub stars and Pluton has 787. Immich has the larger community by that measure.

Are Immich and Pluton free?

Both are open source. Immich is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Pluton under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Immich and Pluton?

Immich is written in TypeScript and Pluton in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Immich or Pluton?

Choose Immich if you want the larger community (114,457 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Pluton if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.