head to head · open source

frp vs Plakar

frp has 109,524 GitHub stars, 15,214 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Plakar has 2,064 stars, 92 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 5,206% (109,524 vs 2,064 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Plakar is written in Go under ISC. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, Plakar 4%. Plakar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K Plakar ★ 2.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp Plakar
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 2.1K
License Apache-2.0 ISC
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 92
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick Plakar if

  • You want the Plakar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the ISC license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Plakar fits your workflow better

full Plakar profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About Plakar

Plakar is an open source backup engine written in Go for the infrastructure and operations ecosystem. It is powered by Kloset, an immutable data store, and it uses the ptar format for self contained archives. Plakar creates snapshots of data, stores them in encrypted and deduplicated repositories, and lets users inspect, verify, and restore the snapshots later.

read the full Plakar overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy kubernetes vs plakar immich vs plakar frp vs pluton uptime-kuma vs plakar caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn kubernetes vs pluton immich vs pluton uptime-kuma vs pluton n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns frp vs SoftEtherVPN

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or Plakar more popular?

frp has 109,524 GitHub stars and Plakar has 2,064. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and Plakar free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Plakar under ISC. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and Plakar?

frp is written in Go and Plakar in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or Plakar?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,524 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Plakar if its feature set, stack or ISC licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.