head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs Pluton
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pluton has 871 stars, 37 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 10,599% (93,190 vs 871 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; Pluton is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Pluton 4%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | Pluton | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 871 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 37 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Pluton if
- You want the Pluton feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Pluton fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About Pluton
Pluton Open Source, Self Hosted Backup Solution That Puts You in Control Intro Pluton is a self hosted backup management platform that simplifies automated, incremental backups across your storage destinations. Pluton leverages powerful open source tools Restic for secure incremental backups and Rclone for versatile cloud storage connectivity wrapped in an intuitive web interface designed for both beginners and advanced users. Website Documentation Features Automated backups with encryption, compression and retention policies powered by Restic Backup Replication Auto backup your content to multiple cloud…
read the full Pluton overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or Pluton more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and Pluton has 871. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and Pluton free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and Pluton under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and Pluton?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and Pluton in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or Pluton?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Pluton if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.