head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs beszel
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars, 8,426 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. beszel has 25,459 stars, 1,019 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 259% (91,477 vs 25,459 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; beszel is written in Go under MIT. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, beszel 4%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (monitoring, self-hosted), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | beszel | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 91K | ★ 25K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 1.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick beszel if
- You want the beszel feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and beszel fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About beszel
Beszel is a lightweight server monitoring platform written in Go and released under the MIT License. It consists of two components: a hub, which is a web application built on PocketBase and provides the dashboard for viewing and managing connected systems, and an agent, which runs on each system being monitored and communicates system metrics back to the hub. The project lives in the self hosted, homelab oriented monitoring ecosystem, alongside the broader category of Infrastructure and Operations tooling, and it is distributed primarily through Docker images published as henrygd/beszel for the hub and henrygd/be…
read the full beszel overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or beszel more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,477 GitHub stars and beszel has 25,459. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and beszel free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and beszel under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and beszel?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and beszel in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or beszel?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,477 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose beszel if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.