head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs Pulsarr
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Pulsarr has 759 stars, 17 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 1,028% (8,561 vs 759 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Pulsarr is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Pulsarr 2%. Pulsarr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | Pulsarr | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.6K | ★ 759 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-25 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 433 | ⑂ 17 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.6K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Pulsarr if
- You want the Pulsarr feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Pulsarr fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About Pulsarr
Pulsarr Real time Plex watchlist monitoring, routing, and notification center Pulsarr bridges Plex watchlists with Sonarr and Radarr for real time media monitoring and automated content acquisition, all from within the Plex app, no extra logins required. Features include multi user watchlist sync, intelligent content routing, approval workflows with quotas, and notifications via Discord, Plex mobile push, and Apprise. 📚 Documentation Full documentation is available at: Quick Start Guide Native Installation Configuration Discord Setup & Commands Features & Guides API Documentation API Documentation Our REST API…
read the full Pulsarr overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or Pulsarr more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars and Pulsarr has 759. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and Pulsarr free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Pulsarr under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and Pulsarr?
tubearchivist is written in Python and Pulsarr in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or Pulsarr?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Pulsarr if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.