head to head · open source
mediamtx vs Lychee
mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars, 2,444 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Lychee has 4,326 stars, 385 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mediamtx leads on adoption by 376% (20,587 vs 4,326 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; Lychee is written in PHP under MIT. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Lychee 9%. Lychee was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| mediamtx | Lychee | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 4.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.4K | ⑂ 385 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick mediamtx if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Lychee if
- You want the Lychee feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and Lychee fits your workflow better
About mediamtx
MediaMTX is a ready to use and zero dependency live media server and media proxy that allows to publish, read, proxy, record and playback real time video and audio streams. It has been conceived as a "media router" that routes media streams from one end to the other, with a focus on efficiency and portability. Features Publish streams to the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, MPEG TS, RTP, using FFmpeg, GStreamer, OBS Studio, Python , Golang, Unity, Web browsers, Raspberry Pi Cameras and more. Read streams from the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, using FFmpeg…
read the full mediamtx overview →
About Lychee
[![GitHub Release][release shield]]( [![PHP 8.4 & 8.5][php shield]]( [![MIT License][license shield]]( [![Downloads][download shield]]( [![Build Status][build status shield]]( [![Code Coverage][codecov shield]]( [![CII Best Practices Summary][cii shield]]( [![OpenSSF Scorecard][ossf shield]]( [![Website][website shield]]( [![Documentation][docs shield]]( [![Changelog][changelog shield]]( [![Discord][discord shield]][discord] Lychee: A Stunning and User Friendly Photo Management System Lychee is a free, open source photo management tool that runs on your server or web space. Installation is quick and easy, taking…
read the full Lychee overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is mediamtx or Lychee more popular?
mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars and Lychee has 4,326. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.
Are mediamtx and Lychee free?
Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and Lychee under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between mediamtx and Lychee?
mediamtx is written in Go and Lychee in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, mediamtx or Lychee?
Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,587 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Lychee if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.