head to head · open source

mediamtx vs Lychee

mediamtx has 20,170 GitHub stars, 2,374 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Lychee has 4,295 stars, 377 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mediamtx leads on adoption by 370% (20,170 vs 4,295 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; Lychee is written in PHP under MIT. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Lychee 9%. mediamtx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

mediamtx ★ 20K Lychee ★ 4.3K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

mediamtx Lychee
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 4.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 377
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick mediamtx if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full mediamtx profile →

pick Lychee if

  • You want the Lychee feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and Lychee fits your workflow better

full Lychee profile →

About mediamtx

MediaMTX is a ready to use, zero dependency live media server and media proxy written in Go, aimed at anyone who needs to publish, read, proxy, record and play back real time video and audio streams across many protocols without standing up a heavy media platform.

read the full mediamtx overview →

About Lychee

Lychee is a free, open source photo management system written in PHP and released under the MIT license. It is a self hosted web application for managing photo galleries in the PHP, Vue.js, and TypeScript ecosystem described by the repository topics. People can run it on their own server or web space, then upload, manage, and share photos through a browser.

read the full Lychee overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs streama mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs cloudflare-imgbed mediamtx vs node-media-server mediamtx vs seanime go2rtc vs streama next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki hugo vs strapi

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs streama mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs CloudFlare-ImgBed mediamtx vs Node-Media-Server mediamtx vs seanime mediamtx vs Piwigo mediamtx vs nginx-http-flv-module mediamtx vs foss_photo_libraries mediamtx vs tubesync mediamtx vs UniversalMediaServer mediamtx vs lap

Frequently asked questions

Is mediamtx or Lychee more popular?

mediamtx has 20,170 GitHub stars and Lychee has 4,295. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.

Are mediamtx and Lychee free?

Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and Lychee under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between mediamtx and Lychee?

mediamtx is written in Go and Lychee in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, mediamtx or Lychee?

Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,170 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Lychee if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.