head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs Piwigo
tubearchivist has 8,451 GitHub stars, 420 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. Piwigo has 3,857 stars, 484 forks, 751 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 119% (8,451 vs 3,857 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Piwigo is written in PHP under GPL-2.0. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Piwigo 13%. Piwigo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | Piwigo | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.5K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-08-28 | 2026-09-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 420 | ⑂ 484 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.5K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Piwigo if
- You want the Piwigo feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and Piwigo fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
Tube Archivist is a self hosted YouTube media server that downloads videos with yt dlp, indexes them with metadata from YouTube, and serves them back through a searchable web interface, built for people whose personal YouTube archive has grown past the point where folders and filenames still work.
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About Piwigo
Piwigo is an open source photo gallery application for the web, built in PHP and released under the GPL 2.0 license. It lives in the PHP web application ecosystem and is positioned as a digital asset management tool for organisations, teams, and individuals.
read the full Piwigo overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or Piwigo more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,451 GitHub stars and Piwigo has 3,857. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and Piwigo free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Piwigo under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and Piwigo?
tubearchivist is written in Python and Piwigo in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or Piwigo?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,451 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Piwigo if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.