head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs CloudFlare-ImgBed
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 stars, 8,746 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 25% (8,561 vs 6,852 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, CloudFlare-ImgBed 128%. CloudFlare-ImgBed was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | CloudFlare-ImgBed | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.6K | ★ 6.9K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-25 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 433 | ⑂ 8.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.6K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if
- You want the CloudFlare-ImgBed feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and CloudFlare-ImgBed fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About CloudFlare-ImgBed
🗂️ Beyond image hosting: an all in one, open source file management hub. 简体中文 English Official Website [!IMPORTANT] If you encounter issues, please check the announcement first. Important notifications and non compatible updates will be explained in the announcement! 1. 💡 Introduction CloudFlare ImgBed is a self hosted image and file hosting solution for Docker and serverless environments, bringing Telegram , Discord , Cloudflare R2 , S3 compatible storage , Hugging Face , WebDAV , and more into one management interface. It provides file management, authentication, directory organization, content moderation, a…
read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or CloudFlare-ImgBed more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars and CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and CloudFlare-ImgBed free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and CloudFlare-ImgBed under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and CloudFlare-ImgBed?
tubearchivist is written in Python and CloudFlare-ImgBed in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or CloudFlare-ImgBed?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.