head to head · open source

mediamtx vs Piwigo

mediamtx has 20,170 GitHub stars, 2,374 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Piwigo has 3,857 stars, 484 forks, 751 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. mediamtx leads on adoption by 423% (20,170 vs 3,857 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; Piwigo is written in PHP under GPL-2.0. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Piwigo 13%. mediamtx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

mediamtx ★ 20K Piwigo ★ 3.9K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

mediamtx Piwigo
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 3.9K
License MIT GPL-2.0
Written in Go PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 484
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick mediamtx if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full mediamtx profile →

pick Piwigo if

  • You want the Piwigo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and Piwigo fits your workflow better

full Piwigo profile →

About mediamtx

MediaMTX is a ready to use, zero dependency live media server and media proxy written in Go, aimed at anyone who needs to publish, read, proxy, record and play back real time video and audio streams across many protocols without standing up a heavy media platform.

read the full mediamtx overview →

About Piwigo

Piwigo is an open source photo gallery application for the web, built in PHP and released under the GPL 2.0 license. It lives in the PHP web application ecosystem and is positioned as a digital asset management tool for organisations, teams, and individuals.

read the full Piwigo overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs streama mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs cloudflare-imgbed mediamtx vs node-media-server mediamtx vs lychee mediamtx vs seanime go2rtc vs streama next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs streama mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs CloudFlare-ImgBed mediamtx vs Node-Media-Server mediamtx vs Lychee mediamtx vs seanime mediamtx vs nginx-http-flv-module mediamtx vs foss_photo_libraries mediamtx vs tubesync mediamtx vs UniversalMediaServer mediamtx vs lap

Frequently asked questions

Is mediamtx or Piwigo more popular?

mediamtx has 20,170 GitHub stars and Piwigo has 3,857. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.

Are mediamtx and Piwigo free?

Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and Piwigo under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between mediamtx and Piwigo?

mediamtx is written in Go and Piwigo in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, mediamtx or Piwigo?

Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,170 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Piwigo if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.