head to head · open source
mediamtx vs streama
mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars, 2,444 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. streama has 9,820 stars, 977 forks, 352 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. mediamtx leads on adoption by 110% (20,587 vs 9,820 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; streama is written in JavaScript under MIT. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, streama 10%. mediamtx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| mediamtx | streama | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 9.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.4K | ⑂ 977 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick mediamtx if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick streama if
- You want the streama feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and streama fits your workflow better
About mediamtx
MediaMTX is a ready to use and zero dependency live media server and media proxy that allows to publish, read, proxy, record and playback real time video and audio streams. It has been conceived as a "media router" that routes media streams from one end to the other, with a focus on efficiency and portability. Features Publish streams to the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, MPEG TS, RTP, using FFmpeg, GStreamer, OBS Studio, Python , Golang, Unity, Web browsers, Raspberry Pi Cameras and more. Read streams from the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, using FFmpeg…
read the full mediamtx overview →
About streama
STREAMA Docs: Ever had a huge bookshelf full of shows and movies? Ever wanted to digitalize them, but didn't have a good way of organizing the files? Worry no more! Streama is your own personal Netflix for just such a purpose! Live Demo credentials: username: demoUser password: demoUser Feel free to play around there as much as you like (everything is reset at night) We will keep this demo updated with our newest releases as they come, so that you can check out new features there first before deciding to deploy them in your own environments. Donate If you want to donate to the developer via bitcoin use…
read the full streama overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is mediamtx or streama more popular?
mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars and streama has 9,820. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.
Are mediamtx and streama free?
Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and streama under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between mediamtx and streama?
mediamtx is written in Go and streama in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, mediamtx or streama?
Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,587 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose streama if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.