head to head · open source
mediamtx vs CloudFlare-ImgBed
mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars, 2,444 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 stars, 8,746 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. mediamtx leads on adoption by 200% (20,587 vs 6,852 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, CloudFlare-ImgBed 128%. mediamtx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| mediamtx | CloudFlare-ImgBed | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 6.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.4K | ⑂ 8.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick mediamtx if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if
- You want the CloudFlare-ImgBed feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and CloudFlare-ImgBed fits your workflow better
About mediamtx
MediaMTX is a ready to use and zero dependency live media server and media proxy that allows to publish, read, proxy, record and playback real time video and audio streams. It has been conceived as a "media router" that routes media streams from one end to the other, with a focus on efficiency and portability. Features Publish streams to the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, MPEG TS, RTP, using FFmpeg, GStreamer, OBS Studio, Python , Golang, Unity, Web browsers, Raspberry Pi Cameras and more. Read streams from the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, using FFmpeg…
read the full mediamtx overview →
About CloudFlare-ImgBed
🗂️ Beyond image hosting: an all in one, open source file management hub. 简体中文 English Official Website [!IMPORTANT] If you encounter issues, please check the announcement first. Important notifications and non compatible updates will be explained in the announcement! 1. 💡 Introduction CloudFlare ImgBed is a self hosted image and file hosting solution for Docker and serverless environments, bringing Telegram , Discord , Cloudflare R2 , S3 compatible storage , Hugging Face , WebDAV , and more into one management interface. It provides file management, authentication, directory organization, content moderation, a…
read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is mediamtx or CloudFlare-ImgBed more popular?
mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars and CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.
Are mediamtx and CloudFlare-ImgBed free?
Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and CloudFlare-ImgBed under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between mediamtx and CloudFlare-ImgBed?
mediamtx is written in Go and CloudFlare-ImgBed in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, mediamtx or CloudFlare-ImgBed?
Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,587 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.