head to head · open source
mediamtx vs tubearchivist
mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars, 2,444 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tubearchivist has 8,561 stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. mediamtx leads on adoption by 140% (20,587 vs 8,561 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, tubearchivist 5%. mediamtx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| mediamtx | tubearchivist | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 8.6K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.4K | ⑂ 433 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick mediamtx if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tubearchivist if
- You want the tubearchivist feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and tubearchivist fits your workflow better
About mediamtx
MediaMTX is a ready to use and zero dependency live media server and media proxy that allows to publish, read, proxy, record and playback real time video and audio streams. It has been conceived as a "media router" that routes media streams from one end to the other, with a focus on efficiency and portability. Features Publish streams to the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, MPEG TS, RTP, using FFmpeg, GStreamer, OBS Studio, Python , Golang, Unity, Web browsers, Raspberry Pi Cameras and more. Read streams from the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, using FFmpeg…
read the full mediamtx overview →
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is mediamtx or tubearchivist more popular?
mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars and tubearchivist has 8,561. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.
Are mediamtx and tubearchivist free?
Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and tubearchivist under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between mediamtx and tubearchivist?
mediamtx is written in Go and tubearchivist in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, mediamtx or tubearchivist?
Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,587 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tubearchivist if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.