head to head · open source
streama vs tubearchivist
streama has 9,820 GitHub stars, 977 forks, 352 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. tubearchivist has 8,561 stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. streama leads on adoption by 15% (9,820 vs 8,561 stars). streama is written in JavaScript under MIT; tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0. streama has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, tubearchivist 5%. streama was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| streama | tubearchivist | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.8K | ★ 8.6K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-26 | 2026-10-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 977 | ⑂ 433 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick streama if
- You weight community size — 9.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tubearchivist if
- You want the tubearchivist feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and tubearchivist fits your workflow better
About streama
STREAMA Docs: Ever had a huge bookshelf full of shows and movies? Ever wanted to digitalize them, but didn't have a good way of organizing the files? Worry no more! Streama is your own personal Netflix for just such a purpose! Live Demo credentials: username: demoUser password: demoUser Feel free to play around there as much as you like (everything is reset at night) We will keep this demo updated with our newest releases as they come, so that you can check out new features there first before deciding to deploy them in your own environments. Donate If you want to donate to the developer via bitcoin use…
read the full streama overview →
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is streama or tubearchivist more popular?
streama has 9,820 GitHub stars and tubearchivist has 8,561. streama has the larger community by that measure.
Are streama and tubearchivist free?
Both are open source. streama is licensed under MIT and tubearchivist under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between streama and tubearchivist?
streama is written in JavaScript and tubearchivist in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, streama or tubearchivist?
Choose streama if you want the larger community (9,820 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tubearchivist if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.