head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs Lychee
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Lychee has 4,326 stars, 385 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 98% (8,561 vs 4,326 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Lychee is written in PHP under MIT. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Lychee 9%. Lychee was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | Lychee | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.6K | ★ 4.3K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-10-25 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 433 | ⑂ 385 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.6K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Lychee if
- You want the Lychee feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and Lychee fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About Lychee
[![GitHub Release][release shield]]( [![PHP 8.4 & 8.5][php shield]]( [![MIT License][license shield]]( [![Downloads][download shield]]( [![Build Status][build status shield]]( [![Code Coverage][codecov shield]]( [![CII Best Practices Summary][cii shield]]( [![OpenSSF Scorecard][ossf shield]]( [![Website][website shield]]( [![Documentation][docs shield]]( [![Changelog][changelog shield]]( [![Discord][discord shield]][discord] Lychee: A Stunning and User Friendly Photo Management System Lychee is a free, open source photo management tool that runs on your server or web space. Installation is quick and easy, taking…
read the full Lychee overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or Lychee more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars and Lychee has 4,326. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and Lychee free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Lychee under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and Lychee?
tubearchivist is written in Python and Lychee in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or Lychee?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Lychee if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.