head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs oryx
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. oryx has 891 stars, 160 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 861% (8,561 vs 891 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; oryx is written in Go under MIT. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, oryx 18%. tubearchivist was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | oryx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.6K | ★ 891 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-25 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 433 | ⑂ 160 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.6K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick oryx if
- You want the oryx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and oryx fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About oryx
ORYX Oryx(SRS Stack), is an all in one, out of the box, and open source video solution for creating online video services, including live streaming and WebRTC, on the cloud or through self hosting. Note: We renamed the project from SRS Stack to Oryx, because we only need a new name for AI assistant to identify SRS and SRS Stack. AI assistant is confused with SRS and SRS Stack. Oryx makes it easy for you to create an online video service. It is made using Go, Reactjs, SRS, FFmpeg, and WebRTC. It supports protocols like RTMP, WebRTC, HLS, HTTP FLV, and SRT. It offers features like authentication, streaming on…
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or oryx more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars and oryx has 891. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and oryx free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and oryx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and oryx?
tubearchivist is written in Python and oryx in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or oryx?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose oryx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.