head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs oryx
tubearchivist has 8,451 GitHub stars, 420 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. oryx has 881 stars, 158 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 859% (8,451 vs 881 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; oryx is written in Go under MIT. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, oryx 18%. oryx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | oryx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.5K | ★ 881 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-08-28 | 2026-09-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 420 | ⑂ 158 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.5K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick oryx if
- You want the oryx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and oryx fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
Tube Archivist is a self hosted YouTube media server that downloads videos with yt dlp, indexes them with metadata from YouTube, and serves them back through a searchable web interface, built for people whose personal YouTube archive has grown past the point where folders and filenames still work.
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About oryx
Oryx (SRS Stack) is an AI driven, all in one, out of the box, open source video solution for creating online video services such as live streaming and WebRTC, in the cloud or through self hosting, aimed at developers and operators who need to run those services themselves.
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or oryx more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,451 GitHub stars and oryx has 881. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and oryx free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and oryx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and oryx?
tubearchivist is written in Python and oryx in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or oryx?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,451 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose oryx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.