head to head · open source

Trench vs Workbench

Trench has 1,663 GitHub stars, 64 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. Workbench has 442 stars, 43 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Trench leads on adoption by 276% (1,663 vs 442 stars). Trench is written in TypeScript under MIT; Workbench is written in TypeScript under MIT. Trench has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Workbench 10%. Workbench was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dashboard), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Trench ★ 1.7K Workbench ★ 442 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Trench Workbench
GitHub stars ★ 1.7K ★ 442
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-04-06 2026-06-01
Forks ⑂ 64 ⑂ 43
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Trench if

  • You weight community size — 1.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Trench profile →

pick Workbench if

  • You want the Workbench feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Workbench fits your workflow better

full Workbench profile →

About Trench

Trench is an open source analytics infrastructure project written in TypeScript under the MIT license. It is built around Apache Kafka, ClickHouse, and a Node.js based service, and it is distributed as a single production ready Docker image for event tracking. The project sits in the open source event streaming and analytics ecosystem, where teams collect product events, query them quickly, and connect data to dashboards, LLM retrieval pipelines, observability tools, or other analytics products.

read the full Trench overview →

About Workbench

Workbench is an open source, MIT licensed dashboard for BullMQ that lets Node.js and Bun teams inspect, debug, and replay Redis backed job queues from inside their own backend, behind their own authentication.

read the full Workbench overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

automq vs trench automq vs workbench automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs hook0 automq vs operational soketi vs timeplus uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

Trench vs AutoMQ Trench vs Soketi Trench vs Timeplus Trench vs Sequin Trench vs Hook0 Trench vs Operational

Frequently asked questions

Is Trench or Workbench more popular?

Trench has 1,663 GitHub stars and Workbench has 442. Trench has the larger community by that measure.

Are Trench and Workbench free?

Both are open source. Trench is licensed under MIT and Workbench under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Trench and Workbench?

Trench is written in TypeScript and Workbench in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Trench or Workbench?

Choose Trench if you want the larger community (1,663 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Workbench if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.