head to head · open source

Timeplus vs Operational

Timeplus has 2,260 GitHub stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Operational has 477 stars, 17 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Timeplus leads on adoption by 374% (2,260 vs 477 stars). Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0; Operational is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0. Timeplus has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Operational 4%. Timeplus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Timeplus ★ 2.3K Operational ★ 477 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Timeplus Operational
GitHub stars ★ 2.3K ★ 477
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in C++ Vue
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-07-26
Forks ⑂ 112 ⑂ 17
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Timeplus if

  • You weight community size — 2.3K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Timeplus profile →

pick Operational if

  • You want the Operational feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You evaluated both and Operational fits your workflow better

full Operational profile →

About Timeplus

Timeplus Proton is an open source stream processing engine written in C++ and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It is presented as a single binary SQL pipeline engine for real time analytics, observability, ETL, and AI context. It lives in the messaging and event streaming ecosystem, with topic links to Kafka, ClickHouse, Flink, ksqlDB, Iceberg, and observability.

read the full Timeplus overview →

About Operational

Operational is an open source event tracking and notification tool for technology products. It lives in the Node.js ecosystem and is distributed as a monorepo containing a Vue 3 single page application, an Express backend, an Astro marketing website, and a shared packages folder published to npm. The runtime stack is Node.js 18 or newer, MySQL 8.x, and Prisma as the data layer, with ClickHouse supported as an optional addition. The project is licensed under AGPL 3.0 and its topics list places it in the self hosted, SaaS, PWA, and push notification space.

read the full Operational overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

automq vs timeplus automq vs operational soketi vs timeplus automq vs soketi automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs workbench uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

Timeplus vs AutoMQ Timeplus vs Soketi Timeplus vs Sequin Timeplus vs Trench Timeplus vs Hook0 Timeplus vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is Timeplus or Operational more popular?

Timeplus has 2,260 GitHub stars and Operational has 477. Timeplus has the larger community by that measure.

Are Timeplus and Operational free?

Both are open source. Timeplus is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Operational under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Timeplus and Operational?

Timeplus is written in C++ and Operational in Vue. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Timeplus or Operational?

Choose Timeplus if you want the larger community (2,260 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Operational if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.