head to head · open source

Timeplus vs Operational

Timeplus has 2,280 GitHub stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Operational has 476 stars, 18 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Timeplus leads on adoption by 379% (2,280 vs 476 stars). Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0; Operational is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0. Timeplus has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Operational 4%. Timeplus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Timeplus ★ 2.3K Operational ★ 476 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Timeplus Operational
GitHub stars ★ 2.3K ★ 476
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in C++ Vue
Last push 2026-10-30 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 112 ⑂ 18
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Timeplus if

  • You weight community size — 2.3K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Timeplus profile →

pick Operational if

  • You want the Operational feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You evaluated both and Operational fits your workflow better

full Operational profile →

About Timeplus

Fastest SQL pipeline engine for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI What's Timeplus Proton 🚀 The fastest SQL pipeline engine in a single C++ binary, for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI. A simple, fast and efficient alternative to ksqlDB and Apache Flink, powered by ClickHouse engine. 🔥 SQL for everything : Native source/sink (Kafka, ClickHouse, MySQL, Postgres, MongoDB, S3/Iceberg, OpenSearch etc.), Streaming ingestion, Multi stream JOINs, Incremental Materialized Views, Alerting, Tasks, UDF in Python/JS etc. ⚡ No JVM. No ZooKeeper. Zero dependencies. Just speed, control and…

read the full Timeplus overview →

About Operational

Website Docs Self hosting Pitch Vision Operational.co is a open source Event tracking tool. Monitor signups, webhooks, cronjobs and more. Currently Swipekit Facebook ad library tool and youtubedescriptionextractor are using this in production. 🔍 View Live Demo See Operational in action with a demo account receiving test events. ✨ Key Features Get push notifications for critical events straight to your phone, or on the webapp Monitor critical events Trigger webhooks via action buttons Understand complex events via contexts(events in events) Usable on mobile as a progressive web app(can receive push notifications…

read the full Operational overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Timeplus or Operational more popular?

Timeplus has 2,280 GitHub stars and Operational has 476. Timeplus has the larger community by that measure.

Are Timeplus and Operational free?

Both are open source. Timeplus is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Operational under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Timeplus and Operational?

Timeplus is written in C++ and Operational in Vue. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Timeplus or Operational?

Choose Timeplus if you want the larger community (2,280 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Operational if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.